Implying? So you mean you assumed. Because you should use evidence to form a conclusion, not form a conclusion first, then find evidence to support it afterwards. To ASSUME, is to make an A$$ out of U and ME.
âActivision said during todayâs Q4 financial presentation that World of Warcraftâs âactive player communityâ at the end of 2019, defined as players with monthly or longer subscriptions, was more than double what it was at the end of the second quarterâ. Interesting how this refers to a dead-game.
*Excluding Mists of Pandaria, whose numbers come from the first week of sales- the Copies Sold and Profit columns all reflect publicly shared data from the FIRST DAY.
Now keep in mind the fact that, barring Mists of Pandaria, these numbers come from the FIRST DAY that every expansion has become available to purchase.
https://www.fanbyte.com/news/americans-paid-activision-blizzard-tax-cuts-2018/
And then thereâs the fact that Activision has been constantly using loopholes to lower taxes for themselves, its safe to say that theyâre making a large profit on their own before you even factor in Blizzard.
Their sub numbers donât really matter when you consider every expansion had to be bought individually for long-time players, whereas everything we get in Overwatch (and in Overwatch 2) is completely free after the initial purchase. The only exception is the PvE campaign in Overwatch 2.
That campaign specifically, is what people are going to pay for, nothing else.
Because why risk putting so much money into something new, when the current thing has already made you so much money?
What if the new game doesnât make anywhere near the cost of production? I mean thereâs NO way OW2 is going to make anywhere near the money that OW orginally did
People are unhappy with how the game is currently, everything of actual importance to the PvP aspect is remaining the same, as are the heroes and maps; theyâre hurting their current playerbase, for the CHANCE at maybe breaking even?
The man taught Arthas, then he defied his order to purged an entire city (seeing how quick the people turned into undead, it was the only reasonable option at the time), came back with a big butt sword to command the undead that he himself has fought for many years. And then stabbed his own father (the king he is loyal to) and then him and his squads.
Like, Uther has had moments of âDude, what?â from my limited times with him playing the WC3 Campaign (I have the pre reforged version THANK GOD FOR PIRACY!), and I keep asking âwhat would happen if Uther actually helps Arthas with purging the city?â
Yet again, that would be totally out of character at the time. He was still a righteous hard headed Paladin that tries to separate Justice from Vengeance. And they donât even sugarcoat it in the new short, they are just masking Vengeance behind Justice tbh.
WoW retail BFA is in pretty bad state and chances are their garbage development decisions could have very well killed world of warcraft, but the whole wow franchise itself got rejuvenated by the addition of WoW Classic, which brought half a million to million of players back into wow. So thereâs that.
The thing is that they have two teams for development of expansions. The A team and B team. The A team did legion and the B team did BFA. Shadowlands is back to the A team.
Legion was awesome. BFA was meh. Shadowlands is likely to be awesome.
Kinda makes sense, considering mop was good, wod was bad, legion was good and bfa was bad again. So shadowlands MIGHT end up good, but what Iâve been hearing about shadowlands doesnât give me hope at all.
And none of the game matters if the gameplay itself is not going to get any better in shadowlands for my class, mage, which was absolutely dreadful in bfa.