Yes there is, and they’ve been out for over a year now. They’re expensive AF.
Yes. If you plan on upgrading graphics later. If you dont care theres also monitors with 120, 100 , 75 hz. Get something with very low response time too 1ms. Newegg dot com has filters for all of that.
1 Like
I was going to respond, but I decided to tone it down a bit.
There are some aspects of what you said that have gaps from a technical standpoint that does not address the question the OP was asking, but otherwise in a basic sense yes.
The OP listed 2 hardware components: CPU + GPU. He wants to increase FPS. These are all of the aspects of a PC that I can think of that impact FPS:
1.) RAM voltage timings / capacity
2.) HD / SSD / M.2 speeds / optimization
3.) Monitor refresh / response time
4.) Nvidia control panel settings
5.) + / - vsync / gsync
6.) Additional programs / browser tabs open / additional windows services running
7.) Mobo / BUS speeds
8.) MOBO / CPU / GPU cooling mechanisms
9.) in-game resolution / custom FPS / settings / tweaks
10.) regedit / TCPackRefrequency timings / TCPNoDelay (for connection)
1 Like
Fair enough my mistake, but that monitor didn’t come out till the end of last year.
However the first 4K device was released in 2003. So it only took about 16 years to reach high refresh rates on 4K technology.
Want to know how long it took for LCD manufacturers to fix Ghosting when they claimed LCD was better for gaming than CRT? lol 
This has no affect on increasing FPS.
This has no affect on increasing FPS.
This has no affect on increasing FPS. Bus speeds are at a point now where actual gaming is behind the curve, that’s why most motherboards do not use x16 PCIe slots in every slot because the amount of bandwidth required hasn’t been reached yet at x8 let alone x16.
Edit: Actually I’m not sure on this one, But, why would this affect FPS exactly?
Has no affect on increasing FPS.
Is it worth it based on his CPU, and GPU and he can get 100FPS.
No, not unless he can sustain 80+ FPS at a minimum. His average FPS and Maximum FPS “DOES NOT MATTER” When you start entering the GSync Freesync technology realm.
How he accomplishes that FPS increase is irrelevant to the discussion unless he specifically asks.
I’m still new to PCs but I would take that money and upgrade your CPU. I bet you get a ton of bottleneck with that CPU/GPU combo
I have the same GPU, you can reach 144 fps easily if you tone down your in game video settings. I do have a better CPU though, but you should still be able to.
BINGO BINGO BINGO BINGO
I can’t tell if you’re trolling or what, but every single thing I listed affects FPS lol. You’re saying that monitor refresh speed (IE: Hertz) has no effect on FPS?
You’re saying that if you open 50 tabs in Firefox, have every single program running in addition to OW, it has no effect on FPS? The speed at which your MOBO delivers data (BUS speed) has no effect on FPS?
1 Like
Edited post, but if we are talking about “Increasing FPS” like you’ve been saying every post.
Then yes, refresh rates have no affect on increasing FPS.
I open 7 games simultaneously and have 0 affect on my FPS.
Sooo… No? Not to mention that’s not how multi-tasking works in Windows 10. Assuming you run Windows 10 that is.
Umm… It sure doesn’t.
Not unless you like bottlenecking with 7-10 year old technology? All of the processing is done by the GPU and CPU how fast either device receives information is kind of pointless unless like I said, you run 7-10 year old technology?
You know most people who are using high refresh rate monitors for competitive games aren’t using it for Gsync and Freesync? The most important thing is maximum frames achievable, not the smoothness of the sync technologies.
In fact the sync technologies are more important for when you can’t keep a consistent framerate going. Also unless something has changed in newer monitors Gsync and Freesync ranges don’t even match super high FPS. If you have something like a 244hz monitor and it’s sync range goes all the way up to 244hz then it probably costs a pretty penny.
@OP Get the 144hz monitor if you can/or are willing to lower settings to achieve more frames or if you’re going to upgrade other parts in the future. Even if you get 10-30 FPS more it will be an improvement over 60.
1 Like
Even if you cannot sustain 144hz, there is still a noticeable difference between 60fps and 100fps.
That being said though, I would highly recommend that you upgrade your CPU to an i5 9600k first. That will EASILY get you to 144hz when paired with your current GPU.
After you upgrade your CPU, then you should get a 144hz monitor.
You know most high refresh rate monitors only come with GSync and FreeSync right?
If it is Gsync or FreeSync, yes, and you could tweak settings maybe to go higher.
Then you completely wasted your money, both the PS4 pro and Xbox One cap at 60fps.
It makes literally 0 difference for you,maybe should have started saving for a pc with that cash.
Not if you use GSync or Freesync.
That 100 FPS goes from 100hz down to 60hz.
So why bother wasting money if you can’t sustain a minimum of 80+ FPS?
Anything below that starts creeping on the waste of money issue
You know most people actually disable Gsync and Freesync in Nvidia control panel/Amd equivalent in favor of maximum refresh rate? It’s negligible but Gsync adds a small amount of input lag and tearing isn’t that noticeable at higher framerates.
You’re giving advice without even understanding what you’re talking about.
OP never specified anything about either Gsync nor Freesync.
He keeps trying to rant about this when OP asked about the refresh rate. OP said their system can handle 100FPS and if they can lower settings it will either make that consistent or make it go higher.