Maybe it was in their contract too.
except theyâre, ya know, the ones who fired him and are bending over backwards to appease the guys who are shooting and maiming people in Hong Kong.
Maybe, but highly unlikely.
Go to hong kong sometime.
Then tell me that fighting for basic human freedom is the wrong thing to do again.
Never said it was, but how is stopping the flow of income for a company going to help them?
We all know you are sitting down in front of a chinese computer in china, shoveling mouthfuls of honey in your mouth. Donât try to front.
sorry, are boycotts too violent of protest for you?
The stakes are pretty high now while we can talk about it. The guy and interviewers are now targets over there regardless of the outcome. He knew what he was doing, but at a great cost so I wish him the best.
You are at least right on one count.
A multimillion dollar company supporting human injustice, however indirect, is criminal in my eyes.
Greed needs a limit.
âMy comfy life is being minorly inconvenienced because people are fighting for their basic human rights, canât you guys just stop it ):â
Gross.
Give it one week.
An american company, on american soil, is participating in blatant 1st amendment violations. Meanwhile continuously spitting in the face of their core audience by censoring content from their games HERE so get them to sell in another market. Nevermind the punishment of the player, pay attention to how they, and other companies are operating within the entertainment industry. Artists are being told âif you want to make money here you HAVE to take things out of your artworkâ.
Never said to stop it. But this isnât exactly the forum for it, now is it?
I read the Hearthstone competitive rule listing the penalties, it wasnât vague at all:
[2019 HEARTHSTONEÂŽ GRANDMASTERS OFFICIAL COMPETITION RULES v1.4] p.12, Section 6.1 (o)
Engaging in any act that, in Blizzardâs sole discretion, brings you into public disrepute, offends a portion or group of the public, or otherwise damages Blizzard image will result in removal from Grandmasters and reduction of the playerâs prize total to $0 USD, in addition to other remedies which may be provided for under the Handbook and Blizzardâs Website Terms.
Pretty clear to me.
Considering Blizzard is in the middle of the controversy right now, I would say it is.
Thatâs what makes it patently unclear.
Exactly what I mean, look get that he speaking for the humans rights of people in hong kong, but boycotting an American company isnât going to help with a Chinese problem.
Read it again.
It means that in Blizzardâs discretion, anything they consider to be offensive or that damages Blizzardâs image is against the TOS. Blizzard decides whatâs offensive, whatâs against the TOS.
Itâs not clear at all. As vague as can be.
Yet they control, and mod the site, there has to be a better outlet for it imo.