With neutral cards like Starships, it’s clearly not meant to be… Which is fine by me, however…
It’s remarkable how a number of other classes can get substantially more armour than the ‘armour class’, namely Warrior, itself.
I don’t even know what to say here.
If ‘charge’ and ‘fine’ coexist in someone’s noggin, then maybe a chamber pot would contain better design ideas.
What?
Warrior was supposed to be a ‘fortress’ — or rather have this option — since the very beginning — in the first expansions, they even fortified it more until it could become one, maybe with the C’Thun stuff it finally did it for the first time… Although the defensive, tanky kind of Warrior was already quite good in Naxx.
Ever heard of cards like New Heights, Trail Mix, Sleep Under the Stars etc?
Apparently, not. Low skill detected…
Yeah, how could you possibly discuss milk without being a cow?
Did you get such ‘arguments’ from some second-rate demagogue handbook?
Parroting the same nonsense (or was that handbook written or insipred by Goebbels) many times over doesn’t make it become true. Btw, have I not deconstructed it already? Ah, no matter, entire topics sometimes get purged on these forums, and I don’t feel like repeating it all yet again.
Even a pug or, at the very least, a trained chimpanzee could probably do it no worse than you 
— you would do well to just accept this bitter truth, in case your self-esteem is founded on it (I even have my suspicions about whose yet another alt this account is 
, judging by this symptom, for example), and move on with your life. I suspect you’ll not, but it’s your problem, not mine.
What’s ‘ridiculous’ is pathetic attempts to manipulate or hand-pick a small and biased sample to support one’s wild and ridiculous ideas.
For example, no, ‘most popular’ [deck] doesn’t mean "most popular among all my accounts on all servers and my two-three virtual ‘friends’, ‘caise the rest are irrelevant’'.