As they say this will mitigate bad rng… So they want to fix randomness by introducing double random! I would be happier at this point if they change ranked to be just pressing play button and just decide winner by flipping the coin.
4 Likes
That’s like saying it’s more improbable to get heads, if you flip a coin twice, instead of once.
1 Like
How is that even close? I am stupid, please explain.
you still have the same chances. its a slot machine mechanic with reroll. depending on the total number of acceptable winning results. lets say for example you are happy with 15/25 and at first you roll bad results when u reroll odds are in your favor for each reroll when u get bad results. overall you shouldn’t deck the card at all. because of the total number of bad legendary or ones that don’t synergize.
draw, searching, discover, and even dredge and deathrattle have better chances to play a card the way you intend to play the card and or reducing the total number of chances on rng with reroll or “rewind” you gamble to change the result but at least in gambling you can win big hence the appeal. rewind needs a more specialized result for example if it were your class legendary. that would raise the appeal slightly making it less crap.
2 Likes
Yes, now you have two chances to get what you want.
1 Like
Yes , if it can’t repeat the same result then a second chance increases the likelihood of getting something decent.
1 Like
To get what you want? I did not know you can choose what RNG to get. Is that right? Did Blizzard gave you that info that now we can pick what rng will happen?
@Jonakin
Or to get something worse, same probability
Learn to read, that’s not what they said
I laugh out loud when I read these posts. I see how many people fall for Blizzard’s lure, which talks about improving RNG when it’s actually tied to how much you pay. Do you think a guy who buys $150 worth of skins gets the same RNG as a free-to-play game? He’d stop playing immediately, and Blizzard is now targeting the stupid whales, those users who spend $500-$1,000 a month for fleeting satisfaction. It would be interesting if some insider published statistics on the number of users who pay $10, $20, $50, $100, etc. Anyway, once you understand that Blizzard is now solely focused on making money fall out of your pockets, your life will improve. Meanwhile, I’ve been playing free Arena for years…
1 Like
And you are try to defend your Blizzard friend, but please what they said exactly that “Yes, now you have two chances to get what you want.” Why do you need to spam?
This guy is just lying even when you can check that in the same thread. Do you think Blizzard will ban him now for that? My posts are removed and acc being banned for just saying the truth about game bugs, but since this person is paid by Blizzard, will never be banned no matter how much reports he gets!
Maybe you should get a life instead of making one up, just maybe
1 Like
Aiming for something through rnadomness is a thing that existed long before video games
You’re pretending they say you can get the exact RNG you want which is not what they said, you’re manipulating their words and making things up and then debate on a strawman
1 Like
Exact thing they said, so simple. If you can read their mind and now what they wanted to say then please enlighten us! I am not manioulating, you do. I just read one simple sentense they wrote and it can mean only one thing that i pointed out!
Btw, anyone else can post 2 comments in a row or just users that are paid by Blizzard? Just asking…
1 Like
RNG has always been hearthstone’s selling point. I want more of it. There’s plenty of card games without RNG (mostly a consequence of originating as a cardboard game), Hearthstone’s initial success came from introducing RNG to a genre that generally lacked it (asides from of course, initial draw).
Since this is the hearthstone forums though if you’d like a different response…
Mulligan Mechanic (stupid post needs to have 15 char)
As they say this will mitigate bad rng… So they want to fix randomness by introducing double random! It’s bad enough we can’t just choose the cards in our starting hand, it’s downright insulting that instead of implementing this change they would just make us do RNG TWICE!!! I would be happier at this point if they change ranked to be just pressing play button and just decide winner by flipping the coin.
You interpreting this wrong.
They make the card - then explained what the card will do (likely, among other things).
They dont start with the intention “mitigating bad rng” - and then make a card from that.
If they did, the game would be vastly different, and far more consistent.
Ok, that was just something i read from their explanation somewhere.
think u missing my point here. i dont mean that the card does something else.
its not that the card does something different. it still does that.
its just that they came up with the description, “what does this card do?” AFTER making the card - not before, to try to “sell” the card/convince people its good.
Think you giving them a bit too much credit thinking they have a specific design concept and carefully plan each one until they arrive at a card.
more like;
dev; “look at this cool card i made” - explains it to the team
team: “what does it do and how?” - dev elaborates
team: “thats under/overpowered - we need to tune it”
card development done + tuned
(before it will 100% get nerfed after its officially added rofl)
marketing: looks at card, tries to justify why the player should want it.
==> we are here, players react to what marketing is trying to sell us
I am a billion% sure that if they instead had a specific idea => spent time trying to craft a card to best represent that - we would not have anywhere near the level of RNG we got in this game at this point xD
As long as there’s sparkles and shiny numbers next to some people’s names they will think they are happy. I like an intelligent card game of wits, which is also what makes a game that can last for ages
Exactly. And in order for game to be fun for everyone, and weaker players can also win, we have ELO system.