Skizzie, I’I understood the whole point! - battle - fly !!
Opponents take 3 decks:
- Guldan;
- Priest;
- Warrior.
This is important as these 3 decks are relevant and the strongest in STANDARD mode!
I took:
- Warrior;
- Hunter;
- Paladin.
Hunter and Paladin are weaker decks against 1. Guldan and 2. Priest.
What happened at the 1st tournament:
1 game I choose a hunter. Opponent takes a warrior. My beloved woman Blizzard gives me a hand of gold. You will win 100 percent by the 5th move. The hunter wins 1 game.
2 game I play on a paladin. The opponent is at war. The paladin wins the warrior. I won 2 times. Everything worked out.
At this time, my opponent goes to the administrator and writes him a complaint that in 1 game he lost. He made the mistake of confusing the choice of playable classes.
Administrator!!! HERE I DON’T UNDERSTAND !!! He tells me that I should have taken not a paladin, but again a hunter, that in game 2 I also had to play as a hunter due to the fact that my opponent in the first game did not choose the right class.
I tell the administrator that there was a fair victory in game 1 with great hunter cards. The administrator tells me that: “He believes my opponent.”
I realized just today what happened. Strength 3 my opponent’s deck:
- Guldan;
- Priest;
- Warrior. These decks are stronger than mine.
Hunter; Paladin; Warrior. Whiter, weaker than Guldan, priest, warrior!
I was kicked out of 1 tournament as meat, that my decks are weaker. I agree here. I am not a tournament organizer. I said that: “The organizer of the tournament orders the music and the girl!”
The tournament organizer awarded the victory to my opponent, because he considered that his deck was better than mine, and HERE, PROBABLY, I AGREE with the tournament organizer. It’s fair!
Skizzi, I don’t understand English more deeply.
- The organizer makes a decision. This is his tournament;
- Today I just guessed. Logics. My mind)) That Guldan, priest, warrior is the top of the tournament. My decks hunter, paladin, warrior are a bunch of dogs. It’s not that important, though. Tournament details !!
Skizzie, but I won twice with weaker decks. This is victory!!! MY VICTORY !!!
That’s why I was not much surprised. I won twice, and mean people decided to cheat me. I laughed afterwards. Although, if you have passed 1 circle. You can also lose on the 2nd circle or on the 3rd circle. The whole tournament process turned out to be difficult))
I went to the next tournament and lost there in the first round
1-2. Which just proves my theory that 1. Guldan; 2. Priest; 3. Warrior is the top STANDARD deck!
In the first tournament I was lucky I won, but I was kicked out)) In the second tournament I lost to these decks.
Justice is somewhere in the middle))
The only thing I didn’t like was that the organizer thought that I was probably stupid and didn’t understand anything. I immediately understood everything. The organizer could directly say: that Guldan, Priest, Warrior are the most powerful decks. Get out of here so I don’t see you again. They came up with a deception. The opponent is mistaken in his choice of decks. I’m not stupid and I understand everything perfectly! I won’t go to complain to my mother that life is not fair))