I just faced no less than seven out of eight pirate Warriors.
The fairy tales to hide naked bias and favoritism make me want to puke.
5 Likes
Miniset recently sold contains key pirate cards that T5 would rather wait to nerf. Moreover, new expansion hits tomorrow and the popularity of the deck is guaranteed to dwindle, at least until the shine of the new cards wear and if the deck becomes less viable.
Turn that frown upside down! 
One. More. Day. I probably wonât be playing today. Which is especially unusual for me. Consider the same.
2 Likes
Iâm also facing loads of Pirate Warriors as Rogue.
I donât get your point.
8 Likes
I would stop those threads for a time If i was you.
Nothing against they personally but Just let it die for a time. Atleast until we make sure mage still sucks from next exp onwards.
Also people here need a break.
Not that they gonna have anything to answer if you stop but atleast they gonna notice that.
8 Likes
Mage players: Noooooo a deck that isnât a mage deck is popular, thats not allowed reeeeeeee
Everyone else: Yes
What do we do about this plague of Warriors though? Donât say nerf them, because weâve established that nerfing a deck because people like playing it is UNFAIR.
6 Likes
Why is anyone shocked to see the deck that is dominating the meta when they queue into the game?
I did not make a post when I played ten mages in a row last month.
Maybe one should play more and complain less or play less and complain less, but to each their own I guess.
3 Likes
Ikr âŚtalk about favouritism.
Mage decks are 20% of the meta for months on end, and but thats fine because Mages are having fun.
Another deck is popular for less than a month and its the end times.
That said I do want this deck nerfed pronto if it warps the next meta.
Damn I got baited againâŚlol
2 Likes
Sure Go ahead and let It exactly as It is.
Atleast i consistent. Donât know about other people.
While were at It give the same treatment to fatigue warlock.
No one needs freaking turn 20 meta.
Iâm playing Devilâs advocate. I happen to think Warlock and Warrior arenât healthy for the meta. But passing those decks off as bias against Mage is a bit desperate. Thatâs all Iâm saying.
Yes a control meta would suck. I agree. However, there needs to be a balance, not just Strormwind part 2. Nobody wants that
1 Like
WellâŚ
Part of the issue here isnât bias but team 5 itself that by this time should have an idea on what people wanna play and be cautious while designing Control killer decks.
Why?
Because people Go like crazy on those too.
I think personally that there are 3 bigpopulations in this game to be aware.
- The âbandwagonâ.
Basically people that switch decks according to tier lists.
- Control killer players
You usually find they in low ranks making sure you not gonna play a control deck with sucess before diamond at minimal.
I would even Go more and say that If a Control deck can get you out of low ranks It is nerf worthy because those guys do anything to rekt Control without even care to their own rank.
Not that they hate Control. Just that They think that itâs fun to rekt Control.
- Mage players
The class is already full enough of people playing it alone.
Devs should consider making the life of mage players more dificult in ways that not resume to âdeleting the class from competitive playâ.
So they could balance the game better and stop use nerfs as populational Control tools.
Already suggested make mage cards Power relative to their rarity for that merit.
Making commons literal junk and epics the most Powerful cards you can put 2 while design legendaries worthy the 1 per deck restriction Power wise.
The increase of dust cost would create a Nice protection against itâs own popularity.
Yikes you got flagged for thisâŚ
Insults and character attacks are common place and âfair gameâ but this is a no no lmao.
EDIT: Kudos to whoever moderates this forums for removing the flag.
Mall is by no means in Blizzard good graces but at least fair treatment is still in place, well done.
Anyway on a side note before this topic gets deleted by mass flagging , do you know how to get this?
I believe the answer is in the screenshot
3 Likes
I just want to play Control again man.
Itâs been a year and the only option has consistently been scumbag Warlock decks that barely count as Control. Theyâre Combo decks if anything.
Just let a slower Warrior, Priest or Shaman deck be viable. Doesnât even have to be Tier 1.
1 Like
The Winter Cheer and Winter Chill bundles are not yet available in the shop.
1 Like
LolâŚyouâre kidding right?
Barrens Priest?
1 Like
I see that was why i was asking , sometimes theres exclusive skins that you can only get outside that shop.
You mean the one where they just went off with Renews, Sethekks, and Bloodweavers, and was instantly and harshly nerfed because players canât handle Priest being viable?
Wow, I should be grateful for that 2-3 week period of a deck I didnât even find that fun.
1 Like
No, the control list with NâZoth as the top end, and just about every boardclear/rng card that existed in standard.
Manâs a Priest main and doesnât know Priest decks. Smh.
Somebody back me up here pleaseâŚlol
I donât main a class. That concept is stupid and limiting.
I just prefer slower play styles, and Priest happens to be slower most of the time.
Itâs still only my 5th most played class.
When was this ever good? Are you talking about Schylaâs homebrew Clown list that got nerfed when NâZoth was âbuffed.â
2 Likes
Fair enough.
Well Control Priest was top Tier at Top legend most of the set. Thatâs the reason it was nerfed. It was kind of on the harsh side but you can see the rationale.
Im not talking about the clown list. The only beefy âthreatsâ it ran were The healing elementals, and sometimes Flesh Giants. It relied on discovering big Dragons to put on pressure.
I donât even play Control normally and even I took it to legend.
3 Likes