[Controversial Discussion] Good Job Blizzard?

it’s called the Pareto principle, also known as the 80/20 rule)

If Blizz was smart they would listent o the 20% of ppl funding their game.

80% raged against the reno mage deck, 20% of the player base could afford it.

Blizzard decided to listen to the 80%, punish the 20%, not good business imo

Wish in one hand, :poop: in the other. See which one fills up first :wink:

so i guess you think they should ignored the reddit threads ?

i dont get it

if blizzard doesnt listen you complain but you also complain when they do and try to figure out what happened

I don’t think people are saying they should ignore the reddit thread, but saying “Good Job” doesn’t seem right. They erroneously banned someone, denied his appeal (even though his appeal included information on the extended turn time bug in his appeal), and then finally unbanned him after public outcry.

2 Likes

You guess wrong.

I believe that praise should be given when it’s due. This isn’t one of those moments.