Update on secret quest item set: it’s a blind man’s set

That’s cool I’d like you to google the goldbache conjecture: I’m one of the only humans alive who knows the answer. You know why every number past 1 is prime? Go to an apple tree with an empty basket, pick a single apple. Examine it and put it in your basket. Pick another apple. Examine it and put it in your basket. What is inside your basket? The answer is not 2 apples as most of you would believe. Each apple is light years more different than they are the same. Only idiots boil it down to the simple explanation.

The answer to why numbers past 1 are all prime is that all numbers past 1 are fractional. Like pie. It’s never two apples, it’s 1.97643849273749594484847263
Or 2.0138474838377392836374846263 repeating. Just because your brain doesn’t work well doesn’t mean mine suffers from damage.

The reason no one can solve the Goldbach conjecture is that it is wrong in its evaluation of the absolute reality of mathematics. You can perceive reality 1 of 2 ways. The red pill or the blue pill. The choice is yours.

My solution to why all numbers past 1 are prime is because all numbers past 1 are fractional, the only non fractional numbers are 0 and 1. I’m Him thanks for coming to my Ted talk.

The response most of you give “that’s a level of too complex most people don’t care to think about” yeah I know that’s why god put me here to share the knowledge.

Let me put my conjecture solution into Diablo terms: let’s say you drop 2 unique helms with identical affix stats back to back. The first one you pick up and examine is technically the prime one. The second one you examine wasted your time at a cost. Which you equip first and click on, where they are in your bag separately, they amount of time to click either or, these are all variables that separate even contextual code data that isn’t in the physical realm. Which makes it, fractional.

Thanks for coming to my Ted talk again. So I solved the Goldbach conjecture, game of thrones, one piece, and the fountain of youth

No need to be so nasty

2 Likes

It’s just the honest truth. People shouldn’t feel so confident throwing stones on topics they know nothing about, especially when they lend nothing to actually discuss. At least my critical points make sense. At least I’m making critical points.

Hate to be negative but your just causing drama on a game forum. Go beat your chest somewhere else. Its really pathetic and cringe.

2 Likes

That dude lives in la la fantasy land. For fs, he thinks he wrote the D4 story line and Blizzard stole it from him.

Post must be 20 characters :joy:

Do you not know that we can all just ask for forgiveness and ALL of our sins will be… wait for it… FORGIVEN. Wasn’t that half the premise of the book written about your man jesus… or the magical man in the clouds… or was it Joe Pesci (let’s see who knows what’s up with that one :wink: )

1 Like

Hmmm… I think it’s pretty clear here who is worthless. This account of yours has to be a secondary joke account of a regular… no one can be this self indulgent, obnoxious and utterly clueless of what they portray.

You mught want to get outside, socialize, interact… something… You live in an isolated fantasy land. That’s seriously not healthy. You need serous help dude. Go get some sunshine, have a beer, go to the beach, go see a baseball game, something besides what is making you cuckoo.

That’s not politically correct to call people that. I am considering reporting your post moron.

You have to mean it when you ask for forgiveness. Those who plead for forgiveness out of fear will never be forgiven.

There is no topic more serious than the masterpieces of man kind and those the grand architect put here to solve them. Turning such things into a “joke” or belittling those who devote their time to such ventures only ensures your own demise. People who would take such actions arent capable of asking for forgiveness, they are only capable of being afraid. Let your fear consume you little sheep. I’m sure it’s coincidence that this is the 111 post.

Straight up,

We are gonna see this thread on CSI Crime Files when they catch this dude.

I’m almost 1,000% positive he’s got a mass grave of neighborhood cats somewhere.

1 Like

Your padawan here. This post is not entirely correct. To use a different object…

A chair may, through conjecture and paradoxically sound logic, not exist, and there is proof as to his. No such thing as a chair, or anything really. Thats doesnt mean that our language and culture doesnt find it easier to describe/name these odd collections of atoms “a chair”.

Technically no two apples are the same, sure, but its more convenient to call those two items “two apples”. It doesnt benefit us to be pedantic about this.

Forgive my laxadaisy explanation, literally just woke up and I experienced a “dream” last night that made be question the reality of dreams as we understand it.

This post did show me one thing. The blues do not read or engage in the forums any longer. We used to get engagement on good posts and S@$T posts like this wouldn’t carry on for this long. Troll posts.

You are misinterpreting what I am saying young one. The point I’m making is every object you think is the same isn’t. There is only 1 and 0. You could have 2 chairs made by the same manufacture made by laser precise machines and both chairs made back to back, they will still be more different than they are the same. You can only examine whole numbers as 0 and 1. Every other true number in existence is fractional. This is a fact of physics and reality itself.

Compare any 2 things that are quoted as being the same, they never are the same. Ever. At any point.

Twins born with the same dna, let’s say somehow born at the same exact moment, they are not the same. They experience time differently depending on their exact position on the earth; they consume different things; have different opinions; the only way to examine them is individually. Because no two things are ever actually the same. Not until maybe you get to the atomic and subatomic levels. But even then it’s a stretch to call them the same atoms. As they too have experienced time and traveling through space entirely differently due to where they are. It’s a fractional difference yes, but it’s still a difference that is real and observable. You might think this is a stupid argument but it’s the truth.

The only whole numbers that exist in reality is 0 and 1.

Oh no, I get what you’re sayin, im just trying to convey that it doesn’t benefit us to take that easily acceptable fact and build our enitw understanding of the universe around it. Convenience for the sake of understanding concept is acceptable. Ergo, “two chairs” or “two apples” isn’t wrong.

1 Like

It actually is wrong, because everything is mathematics. The entire building blocks of physics is mathematics, sure you can feel comfortable using a system that boils the true language of the universe down so much that you de-prime all the numbers past 1 because that’s what current math does. Every single number past 1 is prime. If you don’t think that has a relative effect on our advancement as a species or to unlocking the secrets of further technological advancement, that’s because your IQ is low. I can’t fix that.

You can never at any point in your life have two of something. You can never at any point in your life have three of something. Same for every number past 1. Sad part is what I’m saying is so controversial yet is a simple observable truth. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize no two things can ever be truly the same.

Here’s a real result of not interpreting reality correctly : most people believe correlation doesn’t equal causation. That’s directly tied to the misunderstanding of how math and physics actually work. All things that cause or are part of an event are correlated somehow. They all make up the wider true event that is boiled down to select parts. So that it is easier for our feeble human minds to comprehend.

I dont disagree with you, but there’s a validity in the common understanding of things, too. As long as we can, largely, agree on what we define as an apple, and how we conceptualize the amounts of things, then there is no flaw in saying “two apples”. By that rule, its correct.

See that’s your problem agreeing as if the opinions of sheep matter in matters of the language of the universe. There is only one truth. And many falsehoods. It’s easy to fall pray to false or simpler understanding because the truth seems too complex. But in reality once it’s understood nothing is easier to understand than the truth.

I dont disagree with that either, but to what benefit does it serve anyone to critique them for their succession of accepting the practical and, argueably, useful understanding of something, when yours or mine, though “grander” serves us no practical use?

You got the right one, fella. Ive dealt with a many types of people, and i will gladly challenge you while admitteding how correct you may be.

1 Like