I loved the archivist class. They exploded kill everything around them including themself !
Tiefling
If angels and demons can have offspring (Nephilim) what about the offspring of a demon and a “human.”
The Tiefling see the demon child mercenary in VoH. Mother “human” father demon?
Tieflings are primarily human in ancestry, but draw part of their bloodline from powerful evil beings.
These are the Tiefling’s passives (class mechanic).
- Hellish Rebuke: Melee creatures that damaged you are surrounded by flames and take fire damage.

- Hellish Resistance: You have resistance to all type of fire damage max at 90%

- Flame Tongue: Melee weapons you use also do additional fire damage plus a 20% critical hit chance.

No.
This is a stupid idea that has zero place in the Sanctuary mythology.
No. Just. NO.
The Tiefling is already is the game why is it stupid? Or, are you referring to the Cowboy?
You’ve described the Grimdawn inquisitor mastery combined with either a paladin/soldier as a secondary or Arcanist/occultist for more melee or ranged ranged/curse focus respectively.
The Tiefling is not in the game.
The tiefling is in the DND universe. Not Sanctuary.
We have a follower. That demon child whatever his name is. That’s what he means.
He’s not a Tiefling.
He’s a totally different, unrelated mythology unique to Sanctuary.
This is sanctuaries interpretation of the tiefling.
You do not write or interpret the mythology. You are not on the writing team.
I humbly vote no on stupid cowboys. Instead of gunpowder and firearms, we have brimstone and magic.
Want cowboys? Play Red Dead Redemption.
Btw canons aren’t firearms. It’s in the word. Fire i.e gunfire and arms. Use your hand and arms. Handgun. Rifle. Get it?
Correct. “Tieflings in Dungeons & Dragons are humanoids with distant fiendish ancestry, typically linked to devils or demons. Known for striking features like horns, tails, and solid-color eyes, they face societal prejudice despite not being inherently evil. Mechanically, they excel in magic and resist fire damage.” If that does not describe Aldkin I am not sure what does. A Tiefling would work better in Diablo lore vs a Cowboy. Martimus can come up with his own ideas for a new class if he has any.
Huh this turned out better than I have thought.
Usually when something like this is introduced, all it does is just bring out the people who’ll just reference Call of Duty and say “play that instead” basically telling the world of their hatred for the COD games.
Nice to see reasons against this that makes sense. Me, I personally don’t care too much though it does suck that cause of this we’ll never see a modern Zelda game or an assassin creed one(they started over after syndicate).
A Tiefling is a race.
The Aldkin is a one off abomination.
Honestly, I think it’s the direction the game should take: more DIVERSITY of meta (including innovative characthers) rather than new diversity of beta stuff that NOBODY is asking for (ex: this unique change…)
Take the same time to put in place, but way less risky in terms of damage (the mythic & unique stuff nobody asked is already creating damage on retention:
Live players dropped by 33% versus last week, more drop than any other week.
if you haven’t played Grim Dawn, you should since it technically has the class you just described when you pick Occultist and Demolitionist as your main/sub class.
also there is another expansion about to come out as well.
I want smart cow people to be fair
Wow genius I don’t write for the game? Wow your brain is huge and not tiny at all. Interpretation is just that. Anyone can do it.
There’s an image of Aldkin posted in the thread. Use that wittle bwayne to tell us what it looks like. How about someone adds Orcs into the game but we need confirmation that they are orcs? Naw let’s use our brains instead.
Ahh yes. When someone proves you wrong, call them stupid.
A samourai class should be better.