It should be. I will admit the 15 years took me by surprise when I read it. That’s so heavy handed. People get far less for actual violent crimes that hurt people. Should’ve only gotten in trouble for stealing the flag but they wanted to make an example of that guy. Kinda shows how broken the American system really is
1 Like
Hopefully so, but US has to be careful. Just saying & good luck. US is Free speech last hope.
You forgot Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom - you do not get jailed there for free speech just like the USA. You are completely wrong with Australia on that list, and Great Britain and NZ as I have spent a lot of time in each.
You get jailed in the USA for life-threatening speech and every country. NOT to be confused with free speech. You do not get jailed in the countries I listed above for politically and publicly saying the Prime Minister is an idiot. That is an absolute CROCK. Free speech is enshrined in the UK, Australian and NZ constitutions. Look it up. Jonathan Pie disses Britain on youtube daily, there are Australian and NZ satirsists and in many of the countries you listed doing the same and they are not in jail. They keep putting videos out so they can’t be.
P.S. I am currently living in one of the countries you mentioned and have lived in the others which is why I know beyond all reasonable doubt, it is a crock.
Most people that are being bullied will at least attempt to leave the situation, but you can’t.
You’re addicted to the attention you get. You have your, I think it’s 4, forum personas and who knows how many sock puppets.
You crave it. You thirst for it. You can’t function without it.
If you didn’t, you wouldn’t be here, but you love it. So you will never leave.
It’s truly sad
2 Likes
The sad truth is, & I learned this only a few years ago.
The judidical system is only as good as the people enforcing them. Take OJ simpson as example.
I learned that some of the Jury thought he committed the crime, but they voted him NOT guilty to “right the wrong” of another high profile case involve an Black man.
The judicial system, like many aspect of US, has become battlegound for politic & ideology, & often, Jury, judges that are suppose to remain neutral, have become soldiers in the battles. The wide spreturm for similar crime is the result. This is not okay, but until the politcal climate toned down, I do not see any improvement.
lets be clear, these thing happened in other countries, in far greater regularity. But it sad that countries that should know better are doing in more frequency.
1 Like
Don’t be mean to Barvata!
She provide entertainment. For all her trolling, she at least do not resort to bad insults, I can respect that.
1 Like
Around 2.8K posts.
Around 100 posts to help others players.
Chiltara is jealous 
1 Like
You are right, he does crave it. He continues because of the amount of people who always take the bait. I worry less for a person who repeatedly trolls and more about those who, regardless how crystal clear it is that the post is a troll, will always take the bait. He could holding out a fishing pole while wearing a t-shirt and holding a large font sign that both clearly say “This is bait” and those same people would still bite.
that’s literally how a bully thinks. that I, the victim, should have to submit and leave and not the bully.
you fought for this country?
Im still confused where the math for the altar only providing 1% came from, this thread went completely off track. I mean the description says it doubles the chance of legendaries so why would it only give 1%?
i cant post it here i dont think blizzard would want me to, but just understand that they made a mistake and they likely intended it to work the way you believe it should, but it doesnt and it’s clear why to us mathmatician/programmers who can check the data and process it.
Aint no way bros source is “just trust me bro” 
As an expert myself, I can provide the peer review you are looking for. I confirm OP’s math checks out
They will make you do it again and again until the math says what THEY want it to say, you know this.
1 Like
That used to be true it isn’t now.
It will turn around. Globalism is dying.
Justice will never be perfect anywhere because in the end it relies on humans to do the right thing.
would you do me a favor and change your avatar to something more unique?
- 1698 UK Bill of rights - established the principles of frequent parliaments, free elections and freedom of speech
- Constitution since 1853 in NZ
- Constitution in Australia 1898
- USA 1791 First amendment nearly a century after the UK
As I said a crock. This is not recently unless you want to go all the way back to before serfdom and the USA then was just being discovered by the Spanish (Columbus 1492).
I don’t know about that, but your spelling can definitely be denied. FYI, when you type something and they put the little red squiggly things under it, it means you misspelled it.
1 Like
1698 UK Bill of rights established freedom of speech within parlement not for the general population.
The New Zealand Constitution Act of 1852 established the government of New Zealand and has nothing to do with free speech.
Constitution in Australia 1898. The Australian Constitution does not explicitly protect freedom of expression.
Three strikes you’re out.
1 Like
I live in one of these countries it is still freedom of speech without prosecution unless it is hate speech you are so wrong man. Stick to where you live and know.
EDIT - Seeing you are trying to tell me about where I live - What about Snowden? Assange? - The USA does not explicitly protect freedom of expression either if in some politicians mind telling the truth violates the Patriot Act.