except it’s the same game offered on all platforms minus a few changes lol
keyboard and mouse doesn’t need it.
PC supports controller too though. Also, can’t you play your pc account on your console? So the system has to be uniform between both. You can’t have a charm inventory on console and not have it on PC. There is probably a code solution they could implement as well: auto-loot items to cube when inventory is full.
1 Like
yeah that’s what im sayin’
also, stash is limited for console requirements.
we can see how console and control input decisions matter lol
look If you want to act stupid please don’t be upset if I treat you like someone who is from now on, Want to hear more?
here is thorough post about the matter:
and I already explained how it is not free, yet you act dumb and keep repeating yourself, you are just spamming the thread with the same mantra
Already confirmed by the devs, charm inventory will never happen.
Kasey has a point, you refusing to understand that point doesn’t mean he’s wrong, just like because ppl are “bandwagonning” for charm inv space doesn’t mean your argument is correct. It just means a large quantity of ppl like the idea. How many ppl have ACTUALLY thought about it? Guarantee you it isn’t many, they just thought about it for 10 seconds and said “Yea that sounds cool.” Heck, you’re arguments aren’t even that good and he/she is right about one thing, you’re ego is inflated. You’re not even willing to have a proper discussion about it, the best part is, not once have you actually properly counter argued him. The gist of you’re argument come down to this: I’m right you’re wrong! This isn’t an argument. If you can’t argue the argument then don’t claim your correct. Even you’re gigantic essay has very little evidence as to why it’s a good idea to add charm inv space. In the end, he’s right about one thing, your ego is inflated. Argue his argument or just don’t argue at all.
1 Like
funny thing is I don’t even have an ego, yet you go own about it for an entire paragraph saying nothing but “you are wrong he is right” seems a bit hypocritical, seems like you are reflecting your own emotions onto me perhaps
on the contrary I proved him wrong immediately yet he kept repeating the same point over and over again even though it was fairly simple to deduct his stubborn opinion is wrong, so yes, I am not going to repeat myself over and over again and reinvent to answer him, if he can’t understand such a simple prospect there is really no point beating a dead horse
funny how everything you said about me fits a lot better to what you just wrote then what I did, still you didn’t say anything constructive to how my argument fails to concur his opinion, go own about how I am not the one here to actually have a discussion 
False. Charms were designed to have an opportunity cost just like all other items in the game.
False. Charms have diminishing returns. And since you use an absolute I can disprove this statement by being the 1 person who doesn’t use full charm stash for PvM when I absolutely could.
Here’s an idea… Don’t use a full inventory of charms. It’s not a bad design, you just don’t like the design.
You’re the one acting dumb. You want to get rid of the opportunity cost to make charms free to use. Free has nothing to do with if you had to buy the charm or find the charm or whatever. It has to do with the fact you aren’t giving up anything to use it. You currently give up inventory space. You just want it to be free to use.
1 Like
still repeating yourself:
where exactly do charms have diminishing returns 
, come on do a spiteful no charm run, who cares, I can also finish the game naked without any items on, doesn’t mean I will play like that normally, again your point is invalid
It is, you just don’t like change
People usually afflicted with this symptom are not aware of it and think it is more relevant for other people rather then themselves
and for conclusion, funny how you avoided my strongest points in my entire post and went for all the cheap shots and still didn’t prove your point across, how about you talk about how it actually affects gameplay instead of repeating your nonsense 
?
Its the same people who want Powercreep/Easy way in all the threads.
Its the same in plootplayer 8.Rfift.easyer way to get Hrs etc etc threads. ther is no valid argument. just… Beause we say so.
hey there bugles, long time no see 
I assure you I’m not one of those people, I finished a character with GG endgame gear in about a week and half from launch in D2R playing solo, don’t patronize me 
They have inherent diminishing returns. E.g. You have 2,000 life character. you use 10x20lsc. you gained 10% health. You use another 10x 20lsc you gain 9% hp. you use another 10, you gain 8% hp. These are diminishing returns relative to your current stats.
You didn’t have any strong points.
For good reason. You completely lied about the design of charms.
1 Like
This is the beginning of the mark of a liar right here. Here is a fact of life: everyone has an ego, you dismissing just means you need to self-reflect, not me.
Actually, my entire paragraph wasn’t about whether or not Kasey was right, it was the fact that he has a point and you’re literally dismissing because “you’re undoubtedly correct .” I actually never even implemented my thought on whether or not I agree with Kasey or not, you did.
You acutally didn’t, not once. I’ve read throught it all. If anything, he’s got far stronger arguments than you do hands down.
It’s apperently not as simple as you claim it to be. If you think you’re correct it’s your duty to create good arguments. None of your arguments are anywhere near as potent as his. He seems to have at least a some conceptual grasp of how economy works.
My arguments were not meant to prove you wrong, nothing in them directly attacks your arguments to prove you wrong or your statements, merely to point out the obvious that you have no argument because you haven’t made any goodarguments.
Here is an example of your amazing ability to argue somebody:
What was you’re response to this?
Yeh, you proved him wrong alright… GO get em tiger!
sure did, not only you avoided an actual argument by just repeating yourself over and over like a gen one Pokémon, I now gave you a much bigger pool for output with my thorough linked post and you still avoid having an actual discussion, you are just fighting for what you want and have no valid point to contribute and all you have to show for is to say:
Go read my post again and respond to the topic you “missed” while reading it 
it’s funny how you keep trying to derail my character instead of actually proving I’m wrong, an ego is a juvenile self defense machinimas most high functioning adults grow out of, I suggest you work on that if you think “everyone has an ego”
yes you did, in your first paragraph and in this one as well you did, you are abviously supporting his point and have no way to actually prove me wrong just like your partner here so you try staple different character flaws at me instead of actually saying anything about the topic, which is actually reportable if you read the ToS, you are directly attacking a person instead of actually talking about the topic.
thought you said you didn’t agree with him, curious.
what are you even on about by this point haha, I don’t need to translate every point I make so he will understand it, as I said before if you both can’t even understand something so simple it’s like beating a dead horse and you are proving my point with every post 
again you are just repeating yourself over and over again, seems like I have hit a nerve, so you are just here to argue, good to know
It really seems you think I have an ego if you are trying to get a raise out of me for such a simple remark, keep spamming me with posts both of you, I really don’t mind and I’m not going to get tired 
post has been up a couple weeks now, and its seems a vast majority favor this topic… along the way we’ve learned it could help prevent accidently selling charms…
which provoked the thought of why item locks don’t exist… and should they? well, that seems like a whole other topic… only reason i could see someone not liking that is if it looked ugly… otherwise ya… maybe add item lock to the list?