No, JohnQPublic, I was never addressing that point. I specifically responded to your overt second point about moderation and your convenient rationales behind it.
If you want to discuss something specifically, don’t throw in ancillary topics with it. But you did and that’s on you, not your audience.
There’s no sugar coating, it was simply education. As for disagreeing, yes, but only the second topic which were educated on. Nothing else.
Again, you brought up the conversation about moderation, I added to it. You can’t conveniently ignore what you said simply because you don’t like the responses to it.
As for “fanboying”, you have to be more careful with tired cliches. Simply educating you on how something works, which is all I’ve done, is not agreeing with how it works, promoting the system, calling it right, or any other positive opinion that could be construed as fanboying. Seems you are resorting to plucking a convenient buzz word out of thin air all because you don’t like what you’re being told.
On the contrary, you did when you posted your criticisms on moderation in a public space. If you don’t want to face possible opposition on a topic, don’t make public statements about it.
Further, seeing you are attempting to use the purpose of this forum as a counterargument to my replies, know that this forum is not for criticism of the moderation system, which is what you used it for yourself.
Again, solely because you don’t like what you’re being told.
And finally, let’s be perfectly clear JohnQPublic, I never threatened anything, including post removal because I can’t remove posts. Please, between this and the “fanboying” assertion, enough with the fabrications. They only hurt one’s position.